logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.10.24 2015고단8015
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:10, the repair site in Jung-gu, Busan; and (b) as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi cost because of the lack of cash or credit card, the Defendant took the taxi in the manner that he would pay the taxi cost without the mold; and (c) had the Defendant drive the said taxi to the front of the 1st century National Bank in Yan-gu, Busan, which was operated by the victim B; and (d) did not pay the said taxi fee of KRW 6,90,00, which was acquired by the defrauded.

2. In the case of paragraph 1, the Defendant insultingly insulting the victim by openly insulting 10 people, who were in a place where 10 passengers were in order to get out of the bus that was demanded by the victim B to pay the taxi expenses in front of the 1-dong National Bank of Korea, Busan, Haak-gu, Busan, the Defendant called “the victim shall have the same bitch fome, bitch, bitch bitch bitch.”

3. On July 1, 2015, the Defendant engaged in the performance of official duties: (a) around 22:20, the Defendant sent a notice that he did not incur taxi expenses to a taxi engineer B, such as Paragraph (1) and sent to G of the Busan Police Station F District of the Busan Police Station, which called “I would pay the taxi expenses to the 311 who is a residential place,” and the slope H called “I would pay the cab expenses to the Defendant,” and (b) caused the Defendant to be sent to the said place, and the Defendant Hah would be required to pay the cab expenses to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to B and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347(1), Articles 311 and 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow