The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is a person who works as a restaurant employee, and the victim and the victim are neighboring people.

On September 6, 2014, at around 13:00, the Defendant’s husband and the victim D, before the Defendant’s husband and the victim D, in front of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

9.4. In the case where the injured party was a member of the Defendant’s 112 report his her her her her her birth, whether her son is a fluor about his her fluority without his her parents;

Does bitch bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, v. N. report their births;

Men's patriotism is a man's pety, a man's pety, a man's pety, and a man's pety, a man's pety, and a man's pety living together with both

The victims are openly insultingd by many people, such as the Eastern Residents E, etc. who have observed them with a large voice, and the parents of a majority of the dynamics and victims in the same place in around 17:00 on the same day who have continued to be influences;

It is a low-tension of women.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large interest.

2. Change of the defendant;

A. At around 13:00 on September 6, 2014, the Defendant did not take the same obses as the Defendant’s facts charged, and the Defendant’s husband did not talk with D, a complainant, in a house, in which the Defendant’s husband talks with D, the Defendant’s husband, in the front direction, whether her flusium with the Defendant’s flusium in the front direction;

Man't have to finitely finites, and there was no other person except the complainant when considering the finites in the house.

Even if the Defendant had expressed a desire,

Even if this was considered, this was considered.

Since F is a female-friendly Gu of the complainant, G is a female-friendly Gu of the complainant, and E is a relative with the complainant, there is no possibility of spreading it, and there was no other Dong residents at the site.

B. Around 17:00 on September 6, 2014, the insultd the complainant’s house at the time of the instant case and the husband of the Defendant, who visited the complainant’s house at the time of the instant case, were the parents and the husband of the Defendant. However, the Defendant did not wish to take out the house and to take out the house.

2.