logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.03.27 2017고합362
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for one year and six months, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime at around October 2, 2017: (a) around 21:51, the victim’s main points of “F” in the operation of the victim E, which was located underground of the Ma-si Building of Mapocheon-si, and singing and singing, did not meet the musical stude, thereby hindering the victim’s main business by force by jointly avoiding disturbance, such as having a strawer and killing customers.

2. Defendant A’s interference with the performance of official duties of Defendant A: (a) sealed the body of the above police officer, who was called for a police officer at the same time and at the same place as stated in paragraph (1); and (b) notified the police officer of the above police officer to interfere with the performance of duties by assault and official duties by the police officer assigned to the above police box; (c) was infused the body part of the police officer, who was the police officer, to arrest an offender in the act of committing a crime; (d) was arrested as an offender in the act of committing a crime; and (e) continued to walk the body part of the police officer, who was the police officer, to walk the police officer’s body from the police box to the above patrol box to the police box of the Pocheon-cheon Police Station, and (e) took the body part of the police officer’s body to board the patrol to hand over a new disease, and (e) took the body part of the police officer’s body to the above police officer’s body within the police station that was transferred to the police station.

As a result, Defendant A interfered with legitimate duties of police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

3. Defendant B, who interfered with Defendant B’s special performance of official duties and interference with Defendant B’s special performance of official duties on October 2, 2017, received a report of 112 from the F “F,” and sent to the said police box, which read, “I shall be arrested due to suspicion of interference, etc. with the performance of official duties by the above Party A during the process of confirming the police officer I, etc. belonging to the said police box, etc., and arrested the above Party B with the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties.” The head of the above police box, which is a dangerous object in the table, 1.5cc., 1.5cc., 1.5cc., 201, 1.5cc., 201, 2. The Defendant B continued to keep the Defendant.

arrow