Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, together with C, committed with C, with the intent to forge documents to change the name of the business operator’s business report certificate to himself while operating the “E Burial” in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

1. On April 2018, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated “C” and “G” in the “ proxy form of civil petition documents prepared in advance at the office of the Defendant’s office located in Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 108 Dong 2502, the Defendant drafted a letter of proxy of civil petition documents in the name of “C” and “resident registration number”, which are private documents related to rights without authority, for the purpose of exercising rights following the name of C without authority.

2. On April 3, 2018, the Defendant exercised the said investigation document by delivering a letter of delegation of civil petition documents forged at the H office of the Gu Office of the Civil Petitions (hereinafter “Gu Office of the Civil Petitions”) located under 871 as the position of the Seo-gu Office of the Gu Office of the Gu Office of the Civil Petitions (hereinafter “Gu Office”) as if it was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Investigation report (verification of facts through telephone conversations by a public official in charge of H in the Gu office);

1. Application of statutes governing delegation of civil petition documents;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Articles 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 23 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged Private Document) concerning the facts constituting an offense (each of the fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.