1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justified even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is based on the evidence submitted to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning for the instant judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition or modification as follows: (a) the addition or modification of the foregoing part as stated in the following, as well as the addition or modification thereof is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance; (b) 4 and 20 of the part added or amended as of February 2, 200, “Defendant 1” are deemed to be “Plaintiff 1.” (c) 8-9 of the instant lease agreement, which was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, is deemed to be “the Defendant: (a) the instant lease agreement, which was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, constitutes a license agreement for use of the instant item (Ga) in light of the terms and conditions of the said agreement and the contractual circumstances.” (d) 9 of the eight pages, “the Plaintiff and the Defendant” added “the actual use of the instant license from October 2013 to February 2,

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.