1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justified even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is based on the evidence submitted to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning for the instant judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition or modification as follows: (a) the addition or modification as stated in the following, is identical to that of the part added or corrected; and (b) such addition or modification is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (see, e.g., Attached Form 1 of the judgment of the first instance, and no separate attachment is required). (c) the addition or modification of the attached Form 2 of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to have been cited; and (d) the part 3, 5, “I, etc.” is deemed to have been “I and I’s wife P,” and “

3. On the 9th day of withdrawal, the phrase “the withdrawal was made” was read as “the withdrawal was made on November 2, 2018.”

on the 6th page, "Conversiond Gift Value (=a) 】 (b) ± (c) ± (c)" is regarded as "Conversiond Gift Value (=a) ± (c) ± (b)."

9. Face 17 to 19 shall be deleted.

The following is added to the 10th 5th 10th 10th 1st 5th 10th 5th 201: “The Civil Code recognizes the legal reserve of inheritance and provides for the method of return of the legal reserve of inheritance, but does not provide for the method of return of the legal reserve of inheritance. However, the method of return of the property to be donated or bequeathed is the ordinary method of return. Thus, if the person having the right to the legal reserve of inheritance claims the return of the legal reserve of inheritance by the method of return of the original property and it is possible to return the original property, the court shall order the return of the original property by the method requested by the person having the

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Da71949 Decided May 26, 2006, etc.). Meanwhile, in cases where a third party acquires a mortgage, superficies, etc. after the donation or testamentary gift, the subject matter is either impossible or substantially difficult to be returned, and thus, the obligor is obliged to return the subject matter.