logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.03 2016고단4737
재물손괴
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 7, 2016, the Defendant destroyed the property worth KRW 300,00,000 at the market price by getting off Samsung F, a victim of Samsung C, who was the victim of the above Twitter, and stopped the operation of Samsung C, without any justifiable reason, while drinking alcohol at the Garan-dong D 3’s Doo-gu, Anasan City, Anasan-si, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si (E) together with P Doo-gu, A and C.

2. When Defendant B, who is the Defendant’s daily and at the same time and at the same place, destroyed the property as above and was arrested as a current offender by the police officer H and police officer I belonging to the G District in the Ansan-gu Police Station G District of Ansan-gu, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of report and arrest of a flagrant offender by cutting off the above H’s arms and outside knife and pushed down the 112 police officer.

3. When the Defendant was arrested as a current offender by the Defendant at the same time and at the same place of time and at the same time and in the same place, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and arrest of a flagrant offender, etc., by referring to the cell phones A and B, who was the Defendant’s police officer, to “A police officer, who was in his possession of this flasing, flasing violence,” and thereby obstructing the police officer’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Selection of a fine

B. Defendant B and C: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow