A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around November 2004 to around November 201, 2010, the Defendant: (a) was working as an employee in the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D (V, 56 years of age) in Jeju; (b) the victim thought that he would disregard himself; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant continued to have a good appraisal against the victim.

"2013 Highest 477"

1. On November 27, 2012, the Defendant of defamation, around 05:0, around November 27, 2012, the Defendant called D’s husband G with a 200 person, such as a name-free intermediary in Jeju City, in the name-free box, etc., in F located in Jeju City, as “I ambling the excreta of his body in mountainous districts (find in mountainous districts). I ambling the excreta to “I ambling the excreta of his body in mountainous districts. I ambling the excreta of 190,000.”

However, there was no fact that the victim's wife D had engaged in sexual traffic.

As a result, the Defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim.

2. On December 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) found the above E cafeteria around December 2, 2012; (b) provided a victim D with a nameless customer, “The Defendant sold his body at the influence in the place of mountainous region, carried out a serious bath for the victim D; and (c) provided a nameless customer with a name-free customer who had drinking the disturbance.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. Around December 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought the said E restaurant around December 8, 2012; (b) took a bath to the victim D with the large sound that the victim D “insturing”; and (c) had a customer under the name and influencing the disturbance, who performed the surgery by avoiding the disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

4. On December 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought the above E cafeteria around December 25, 2012; (b) performed a serious bath to the victim D, stating that “The instant E cafeteria was a fluent juvenile of mountainous districts; (c) the Defendant provided the victim D with a nameless customer who was in the place where the disturbance was avoided.”

This is the defendant.