1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,748,107,602 among the Plaintiff and KRW 37,575,472 among the Plaintiff, shall be from December 12, 2017, and KRW 4,498,790.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is in the status of the parties 1) A apartment in the female city E (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) The Defendant is a company that constructed and sold the instant apartment in order to manage the 19-dong 19-dong 1080 households, and the Defendant is a company that constructed and sold the instant apartment, and the Defendant’s Intervenor is a company that completed the construction of the instant apartment after being awarded a contract with the Defendant for the new construction

B. On November 21, 2012, a pre-use inspection and the instant apartment was conducted on the instant apartment, and was delivered to the occupants around that time.

C. The Defendant’s Intervenor constructed the instant apartment, and did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or modified or defective construction differently from the design drawing. As a result, there were defects such as rupture water, etc. on the instant apartment after the date of the inspection of the use of the instant apartment, and the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to repair the defects. 2) On the instant apartment, there exist any defects such as the defect in attached Table 1 and the defect in attached Table 2, such as the sum of the defect repair expenses and the sum of the defect repair expenses in attached Table 2 (hereinafter “the instant defect”). In order to repair the instant defect except the spug defects, the following expenses are needed to cover the same amount as indicated in the following table.

(A) As to the 1 year following the 1st 4th 4th 1st 4th 1st 4th 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 4th 4th 1st 4th 4th 1st 4th 1st 3th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 1