Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of two thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

D The operator of the “F Game Center” (hereinafter referred to as the “F Game Center”) in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Game Center”), G reaches the “B”, and H is an employee of the business division who comprehensively manages the game of this case, such as mountain, customer and employee management, and the head of the business division in charge of exchanging the game of this case, and the Defendant A, I, Defendant B, and Defendant C.

1. No person committing a joint crime against D, H, or Defendant A shall distribute or use game products that have not been rated, and shall exchange tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, D, H, and Defendant A, while operating the game of this case, intended to provide customers with game products different from the contents of the rating and gather the scores obtained by customers.

Accordingly, from August 28, 2015 to September 18:00, 2015, Defendant D, H, and Defendant A set up 40 game machine for “sesea beng” game, the contents of which are different from the contents of rating classified by the Assembly of the Water Rating Board members, provided to unspecified customers with 40 units of “sesea beng” game, the contents of which are changed so that there exists a separate settlement function, unlike the contents of rating classified by the Assembly of the Water Rating Board members, and exchanged cash customers after deducting 10% of fees per point obtained by the customers after calculating the points of 5,00 won per point.

As a result, D, H, and Defendant A provided customers with a game content different from the rating obtained, and made customers play gambling and other speculative acts by using game water by transferring the tangible and intangible result obtained through the use of game water.

2. On September 2, 2015, the Defendant served in the game of this case as an employee, and on September 2, 2015, entered a paper in order to verify the scores of customers and exchange them, notified customers A of points in mobile phone text, and made customers feel a heart. The contents of the class D are different.