logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.10.23 2011고정1465
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who manages the safety and health of the employees under his control as the head of the management office of the headquarters of the Emerial Association located in Ansan-gu, and Defendant B is the representative of the Emerial Association and the business owner.

With respect to a disaster resulting from the fall of a dog with a height of 2.7 meters, among those entering a parking machine inside the entrance installed in the entrance of a third floor mechanical parking facility, in order to verify as long as the parking machine was not operated, by an employee network F, who is in charge of DNA building guards and parking management at the request of the visitors, at the time of Ansan-si, in order to verify as to whether or not the parking machine was not operated, by an employee operating the Doese F, who is in charge of DNA building guards and parking management in the Dogdong-si Building at the time of Ansan-si around 16:40 on January 10,

A. Although Defendant A had a lighting facility with at least 75 lux so that workers can safely walk, Defendant A did not install a lighting facility with at least 75 lux in the passage of a mechanical parking lot.

B. Defendant B did not take necessary safety measures in relation to the business, such as the criminal facts of Defendant B committed on behalf of the Defendant.

2. Article 15 of the former Rules on the Industrial Safety Standards (amended by Act No. 101, Mar. 31, 2011) provides that “a business owner shall install lighting or lighting fixtures in at least 75 luxs on the passage so that workers may safely pass: Provided, That the same shall not apply where a business owner has a worker passing through the pits or underground rooms, etc. which do not pass regularly, use a portable lighting fixture.”

In full view of all the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor as to the instant case, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendants failed to install lighting facilities with at least 75 blocks on the passage inside the instant mechanical parking lot at the time of the accident as stated in the instant facts charged, and it is otherwise recognized.

arrow