Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. The owner of a vehicle transporting livestock, crude oil, eggs, animal medicine, feed, research fees, livestock excreta, manure, compost, rice saws, rice saws, saws, saws, saws, and nabs, shall register the relevant vehicle with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the place of registration under the Motor Vehicle Management Act;

Nevertheless, from around December 30, 2016 to January 4, 2017, the Defendant manufactured the unused feed to be remaining food from “C” in the operation of the Defendant located in Yangju City, but operated the said vehicle in a state where the Defendant had not registered the said vehicle by using D vehicles owned by the Defendant and transporting the feed to “G farm” in the Socheon-gun E, Seocheon-gun, Inc., a livestock-related facility.

2. On April 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and for a violation of the Prevention of Contagious Diseases Act by the Jung-gu District Court on April 13, 2017, and two years of suspension of execution. The said judgment became final and conclusive on April 20, 2017 (i.e., the order 4296, the order 2017, the order 8777 (Joint)). Of the criminal facts of the final and conclusive judgment, the owner of a vehicle having access to livestock-related facilities who enters the relevant vehicle shall register the relevant vehicle with the Mayor, etc. having jurisdiction over the place where the vehicle is registered.

The defendant is a person who operates a comprehensive food waste recycling business with the trade name called C in both weeks, and supplies feed.

From May 28, 2014 to January 5, 2017, the Defendant manufactured the unpaid feed to be the food remaining in C located in both weeks from May 28, 2014, and supplied the said vehicles to H (from May 28, 2014) and I (from October 8, 2014), which are livestock-related facilities, using the vehicle, and operated the said vehicles without registration.

“” includes the content.

However, according to the records of this case, D vehicles and H vehicles recorded in the facts charged of this case are the same vehicle (which seems to have any clerical error in the vehicle number in the criminal facts recorded in the above final judgment), and the facts charged of this case.