1. As to the Defendant’s motion for revocation of removal No. 2013-415 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor on December 9, 2013.

1. Details of the petition review and decision;

A. From September 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff served as Chigh School (hereinafter “C high school”) entrance officer, and served as C high school society and teachers on March 1, 2011, and the Intervenor joining the Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a school foundation that established and operated a school library on March 1, 2010.

B. On February 20, 2013, the Intervenor Council requested the Disciplinary Committee to make a heavy disciplinary decision against the applicant, and on April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff removed the applicant through a resolution of the Disciplinary Committee. However, on May 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Defendant on May 16, 2013. On July 22, 2013, the Defendant made a decision to revoke the removal on the ground that there is procedural defect in violation of Article 65 of the Private School Act to guarantee the Plaintiff’s opportunity to attend at least two times.

C. On August 8, 2013, the Intervenor’s board of directors again requested a heavy disciplinary decision to the Disciplinary Committee. On August 9, 2013 and August 19, 2013, the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee notified the Plaintiff of the attendance, and submitted a written statement from the Plaintiff on August 28, 2013, and decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on August 29, 2013 (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”), and on September 23, 2013, the Intervenor removed the Plaintiff from office on the ground of the disciplinary cause as follows (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”).

(hereinafter “Removal” 1. 1. Violation of the duty to maintain dignity (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”) 1: The Plaintiff’s distribution of false information: (a) on December 201, 201, the Plaintiff prepared a document stating false information as follows; and (b) contained a third party (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1-1”) in the school room, such as having many teachers read it.

(1) (1) there is suspicion that the cost of overseas training of teachers conducted in December 2011 is a travel agent rebates. (2) The support was provided to unmarried female teachers (the name of D.D.) with a full-time deposit of KRW 50 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000