Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
3,500,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. On June 2017, Defendant C and the Defendant offered that “When he was asked to introduce and request an employee to work at the above main point of “A” from the victim E who was in charge of the joint crime of Defendant C, he/she received a large amount of advance payment from the main point of “C, even though he/she did not think of the work at the main point of “C,” and he/she received a large amount of advance payment from the main point of “C,” and the said C accepted it.
Accordingly, the defendant has the same damage.
7.1. The facts of the victim on January 1, 200 are as follows: even if the above C received the advance payment, even though it did not have the intent or ability to perform the work at the above entertainment point, the above C had been introduced as if it continued to do the work at the above entertainment point; and the above C, as if it was promised with the victim, as if it was committed with the victim at the car page near the Bapool, the victim was sent from the victim on the 3rd day of the same month to the national bank account in the above C’s name (F) around the same month.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with the above C, thereby deceiving the victim, and received property from the injured party.
B. The Defendant, G, and H’s joint crime was known to the general public on July 2017.
After having received a proposal from G to the main points located in the Guate Th to introduce He, the victim E was willing to avoid committing the crime of false gold fraud, such as paragraph 1(a).
Accordingly, the Defendant, along with the above H, sent the victim to the restaurant located around July 2, 2017, and even if the above H received the advance payment, despite having no intention or ability to perform the work at the above main point, the above H continued to do the work at the above main point, and the above H deemed the victim to have paid the advance payment at the same place.