Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 13, 2016, around 13:30, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by putting the D 1st floor “E” store located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-si; (b) by putting the victim F, who manages the said store, into a household room with any 245,200 won worth of the market price, such as the Belgium 1, sack2, 3, and 200 won in total, using any cresh in which the surveillance of the victim F, who was neglected.

2. On September 13, 2016, around 14:03, the Defendant: (a) stolen goods worth KRW 276,100, total market value, including KRW 1,276,100, and KRW 276,100, from the store located in the “G” store of the above D 7th floor; (b) the victim H, who managed the said store, using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim H, was neglected; and (c) the Defendant stolen the said goods by means of loading them into the

3. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant, around 14:30 on the 14:30th of the above D underground floor, stolen the Defendant by inserting it in a bank, which had food worth KRW 112,760, a total market price, such as regradation, early, and congradation, in which the surveillance by the victim JJ managing the said store was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement prepared by K, F, and H;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of the statutes on photographs of damaged articles, seized articles and photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the defendant had been punished three times for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is likely to have committed the crime due to extreme stress, such as the defendant raising his or her child under an economic difficult situation, etc. In light of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, or the fact that the defendant raises his or her child under the economic difficult circumstances, all of the victims are returned, and some of the victims are not subject to the punishment of the defendant, the defendant is against the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, and other various sentencing conditions