Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 10, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter referred to as “Liberia”) as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter referred to as “Liberia”) and applied for refugee status (hereinafter referred to as “previous application for refugee status”) to the Defendant on December 17, 2015, but was subject to a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status on December 29, 2015. However, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 26, 2016, but left the Republic of Korea on February 23, 2016, which was before the decision was made upon the application.
(A) On October 27, 2016, the final decision of dismissal was made regarding the above objection.
On June 11, 2017, the Plaintiff re-entered the Republic of Korea as a visa exemption (B-1) qualification and applied again for recognition of refugee status to the Defendant on June 20, 2017.
C. On September 28, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the Plaintiff as a “ sufficiently-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).
On November 9, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on November 9, 2017, but was dismissed on March 21, 2018.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The key point of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that, around 2011, the Plaintiff was faced with imminent harm, such as suffering from dangerous weapons, on the ground that “the Plaintiff provided information to Liberian Government Organizations at around 2003,” from the former president B of Liberia.
In addition, the plaintiff was threatened by the plaintiff's father's transfer of his/her inherited property from the third village.
Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff returns to Liberia, he is suffering from gambling for the above reasons.