(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정546

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정546

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident) by the Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a DNA rocketing motor vehicle.

A. On June 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car on June 28, 2017, and changed the course from the two-lane to the one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one road in front of the F Driving Schools in Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Hoju-si.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent collisions with other motor vehicles and safely drive the front, rear and left well, and accurately operate the steering and brake system, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to the Defendant’s negligence of changing the vehicle line as it was, which led to the Defendant’s negligence, to the right side of the Victim G Driving’s H bargaining car running in one lane, with the lower part of the left side of the said rocketing car.

In the end, the Defendant did not take necessary measures even after destroying the above-learning passenger car to be in excess of KRW 642,497.

B. On June 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car at around 03:46, and led to the passage of the two-lane roads on the Cheongju-si I and the front letter to the Cheongju-gu Cheongju-gu Cheongju-gu Gyeong-gu Gyeong-gu Cheongju-do.

At the time, night was installed and structures were installed for construction work in the front section, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving a person engaged in driving business by taking into account the traffic situation of the front section.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to perform the duty of her on the front bank by neglecting the duty of her on the front bank, and caused the structures installed on the road by neglecting the duty of her on the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant is guilty of occupational negligence as above.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.06.23 2016고단422

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.22 2019고단8423

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.06.12 2018고단40

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.22 2017고단3387

-대전지방법원 2021.01.13 2020고단3853