1. The Defendant’s disposition of extending prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on June 9, 2017 (the period: from June 16, 2017 to December 15, 2017).

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From 198 to 2010, the Plaintiff received a notice from the head of Mapo Tax Office on imposition and collection of value-added tax, global income tax, and capital gains tax (hereinafter “each of the instant taxes”) in total of KRW 311,228,90 from the head of Mapo Tax Office, and is delinquent in total of KRW 418,472,810 as of March 21, 2017 (including surcharges).

Serial 28.30 on June 30, 1998: value-added tax; 31,530,50 on June 30, 1998; 230 on March 31, 200; 28,624, 970; 624; 50, 665, 67.36.63, 60 on May 31, 200, 206, 207; 40.36.63, 60 on May 31, 200, 207; 40.63, 163, 663, 60 on May 31, 200; 16.63, 60 on May 30, 206; 200 on May 24, 200; 200,000 on May 4, 206, 163636,57

B. On June 16, 2009, the Defendant issued a disposition to prohibit departure for six months pursuant to Article 4(1)4 of the Immigration Control Act on the ground that national taxes are delinquent, and thereafter extended the period to continue on a six-month basis pursuant to Article 4-2 of the Immigration Control Act. On April 18, 2017, the term of prohibition of departure was extended from December 16, 2016 to June 15, 2017, and again issued a disposition to extend the term of prohibition of departure from June 9, 2017 to December 15, 2017 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff.