logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.03.11 2020구단57885
출국금지기간연장처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. As of March 12, 2018, the Plaintiff was delinquent in national taxes of KRW 513,332,450 (hereinafter “the instant amount of national taxes in arrears”) as indicated in the “amount of national taxes in arrears” as indicated below, and thereafter, paid KRW 357,464,00 as indicated in the “amount of national taxes in arrears” column. At present, the amount of delinquent taxes is approximately KRW 339,728,460, including additional taxes and additional dues.

The current amount of tax notified by the deadline for the initial payment of the tax items shall be 2013-11-30 942,00 942,00 28,260 201,932,450 1,932,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,269,137-15,280 1,936,280 1,936,280 746,280 746,270-02, 507, 50740, 507-15, 507, 507, 9306, 930, 682, 930, 480, 480, 480, 15, 868, 178, 209, 308, 2013-184, 805

B. Upon receipt of a request from the Commissioner of the National Tax Service for prohibition of departure on March 12, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff from March 19, 2018 to September 15, 2018 pursuant to Article 4(1)4 of the Immigration Control Act, upon receipt of a request from the Commissioner of the National Tax Service, and thereafter, continued to extend the period of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on six-month basis pursuant to Article 4-2 of the Immigration Control Act on September 10, 2020, and again issued a disposition of extension of the period of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff from September 16, 2020 to September 15, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 6, 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The attachment to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows;

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The number of entry into and departure from Korea during the last one year is three times as of the date on which the Plaintiff requested prohibition of departure.

arrow