1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On November 1, 1998, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “B”) established Company B (hereinafter “B”) and re-established and operated as the representative director, and the Plaintiff defaulted on October 2, 2003.

On June 2015, the head of Western District Tax Office notified B of the amount of KRW 163,205,480 (including additional dues and aggravated additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), corporate tax of KRW 122,914,300 (including additional dues and increased additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), corporate tax of KRW 122,914,300 (including additional dues and increased additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), wage and salary income tax of KRW 33,70 (including additional dues and increased additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), retirement income tax of KRW 83,410 (including additional dues and increased additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), retirement income tax of KRW 33,70 (358,380, including additional dues and increased additional dues), and of the amount of tax in arrears as of June 2015).

In addition, the director of the Incheon Tax Office decided and notified the Plaintiff of the global income tax amounting to KRW 423,949,870 (including additional dues and aggravated additional dues for arrears as of June 2015), which belongs to the year 2003, based on the recognition of representative due to omission in reporting the sale of fixed assets B.

Each of the above numbers was written on the basis of the statement in Eul evidence No. 6.

As above, the Plaintiff was in arrears with taxes of KRW 1,245,542,310 as of June 2015, including global income tax related to B and global income tax of KRW 1,126,200 (including additional dues and aggravated additional dues as of June 2015).

On January 9, 2012, the Defendant prohibited the Plaintiff from departing from the Republic of Korea from January 9, 2012 to July 9, 2012 pursuant to Article 4(1)4 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 1-3(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act.

After that, the Defendant continued to extend the Plaintiff’s period of prohibition of departure under Article 4-2(1) of the Immigration Control Act, and extended the Plaintiff’s period of prohibition of departure on July 8, 2015 until November 8, 2015.

The defendant did not extend the term of validity of the passport held by the plaintiff on November 8, 2015 to the plaintiff who terminated on November 8, 2015.

After that, the Plaintiff is new.