Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for four months, for each of the defendants B.

, however, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2014, at around 23:26, the Defendants conspired and submitted a written estimate of maintenance of KRW 73,534,328 to the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, the Defendants: (a) the Defendants attempted to receive insurance money equivalent to the above amount from the victim company as the insurance money, but attempted to receive the insurance money from the victim company as the insurance money, and attempted to make a false declaration, despite the fact that there was an accident that the said Acccccoo was placed into the reservoir while driving the Ccoo-gun vehicle at the center; (b) the Defendants attempted to receive the money from the victim company as the insurance money; and (c) the Defendants attempted to receive false declaration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of E and F;

1. Any statement corresponding thereto among the protocol of inspection by this Court;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Records related to accidents, and report on internal investigation (compacting of engineering analysis reports);

1. Details of sending A, details of H, and details of sending I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (related to the nominal owner of a mobilephone, data file and analysis, analysis of communications data, analysis2 of communications data, suspect A's criminal administration, A's criminal administration2, and A's false statement);

1. Relevant Articles 352, 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant B) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination of the defendants and defense counsel's assertion of the community service order (defendant B) Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The alleged Defendants and the defense counsel are going against the central line by Defendant A.

It is argued that there was no fact that the insurer was involved in the accident of being placed on the reservoir on the wind of rapid operation of hand hand on the right side of the damaged vehicle, and that the insurer did not have obtained insurance money by fraud.

2. The judgment is duly adopted and investigated.