2015 fixed number 1862 - 1 (Separation)

(b) A perjury;

(b) KimA (77 years, inn), free of office;

Residence

Reference domicile

Yellow (Public Prosecutions) and class (Public Trial)

May 12, 2016

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant who has converted 100,000 won into one day when the above fine has not been paid;

shall be confined in a workhouse.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Criminal facts

Co-defendant B (hereinafter only referred to as "leB") committed an accident with "in collusion with KimC, on June 23, 2014: around 26, 2014, in front of the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-gun, despite the fact that there was an accident, KimC driven the vehicle at the Central line and avoided the vehicle coming into the reservoir while driving the vehicle at the Central line, while driving the vehicle at the port. On the other hand, Co-defendant B made a false report to receive KRW 73,534,328 of the insurance money, but it was attempted to receive KRW 73,534,328 of the insurance money. "The charge was prosecuted as an attempted charge, and the trial was pending at the Ulsan-do District Court."

From that point of view, leB would be subject to heavy punishment due to the same criminal power. On April 10, 2015, at the coffee shop located in Ulsan Nam-gu, the testimony was made to the effect that the defendant was actually taking on the vehicle at the time of the accident, but the vehicle accident was actually occurred. The statement was made to the effect that the defendant was given to the same effect.

Since then on April 23, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the court of Ulsan District Court No. 303, Ulsan District Court at around 00: (a) and testified after being sworn; (b) “A witness has been living together on June 2, 2014; and (c) Defendant leB, known to him at the 5 p.m. level at the 5 p.m. level at the 5 p.m. level, was between the Defendant and the cafeteria operated by the Defendant.

It is necessary to do so? The question of the counsel "I see," "I am the defendant's vehicle and kis about several times in the way the accident occurred?" The question of the counsel "I am the mind that I am unsather? I am unsather? I am the "I am? I am? I am the witness? I am at the time of the accident? I am the bar? I am? I am the witness ‘I am back with the back? I am? I am the witness ‘I am? I am? I am the defendant asked about ‘I am? I am? I am? I am? I am the answer of the counsel ‘I am? I am the you asked about ‘I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am the defendant ‘I am the you asked? I am to answer the question of the counsel?'.

However, as the Defendant was not on the spot, there was no explanation about the accident from leB, even if he was involved in the foregoing vehicle, such as leB, and that the vehicle was absent from the vehicle, such as leB, with the vehicle left the reservoir, there was no fact that there was no explanation about the accident.

In the end, leB instigated the defendant to perjury, and the defendant made a false statement against his memory and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

(Omission)

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of criminal facts;

Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of fines;

1. Statutory mitigation;

Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Confession)

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Order of provisional payment;

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Judge Lee Associate-hoon