Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

B B (hereinafter “B”) prior to the separate declaration, the co-defendant B (hereinafter “B”) committed an accident that “In collusion with C, and was placed on the front of the two mountain-ris, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, Seoul-do, for about June 23:26, 2014, even though there was no accident, C was involved in driving a c motor vehicle in D while driving the c motor vehicle while driving the c motor vehicle in the central line and avoiding the vehicle coming from the c motor vehicle in the said reservoir.

It was intended to receive 73,534,328 won of insurance money by making a false report, but it was attempted to do so.

“The charge was prosecuted for attempted fraud and was pending in the Ulsan District Court’s trial.

Of them, B would be subject to severe punishment due to the same criminal history, and around April 10, 2015, at the coffee shop located in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, the Defendant made a resolution to offer the same purport to the same effect to the Defendant by requesting that “The Defendant was taking a vehicle at the time of the accident, but was actually taking the vehicle at the time of the accident, and the fact that the vehicle accident actually occurred.”

Since then on April 23, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the court of Ulsan District Court 303, Ulsan District Court 303 around 16:00, and testified after being sworn, there is a fact between the Defendant B, known to the 5 p.m., and Defendant B, known to the 5 p.m., in the E cafeteria operated by the Defendant.

In the case of "Woo-man's inquiry", "A witness" has kis on several occasions during the course of getting on and off his/her vehicle and getting on and off his/her vehicle, and the accident is the same.

The term "Woo-man's inquiry" is the example of "Adson's inquiry", and at the time of the accident, the motor vehicle left the reservoir because it is too play and has no memory accurately.

The term "in the case of the question of the counsel of "," " the defendant has first left the back and has also taken the witness back.

“The question of the counsel.”