(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.06.03 2015고단448

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.06.03 2015고단448

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2009, the Defendant stated that the Defendant was liable for personal debt equivalent to KRW 50 million to the Defendant, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim E due to the lack of a certain amount of income, he/she was using the bonds with the interest of KRW 100,000 per month, and if he/she borrowed KRW 11,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, the Defendant would have repaid the above bonds and repaid the borrowed money.”

In this respect, the Defendant received KRW 11 million from the victim as the borrowed money on the same day, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around December 24, 2009, the Defendant had a personal obligation of KRW 50 million to the Defendant, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of a certain amount of income, there was no intent or ability to repay the borrowed money from the victim, and despite that the Defendant was to use the borrowed money from the victim for the repayment of bonds, the Defendant would have to undergo an operation with good faith that the Defendant had no intention or ability to use the borrowed money for the repayment of bonds. However, the Defendant would have to undergo an operation with good faith that he was living in his house. The Defendant concluded that, in order to prevent her friendship from forming a farmer, the Defendant would have to purchase the land in which she tried to purchase the farmland in which she had no intention to do so. The Defendant would have borrowed KRW 17 million,00,000,000,000,000.”

Accordingly, the Defendant received 17 million won from the victim as the borrowed money on the same day and acquired it by fraud.

3. On April 1, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant had a personal obligation equivalent to KRW 50 million to the Defendant, and even if the Defendant did not borrow money from the said victim due to the absence of a certain amount of income, it is necessary to purchase the goods from the victim by telephone to “the cost of purchasing the goods to operate the goods at a drinking water. It is necessary to lend three million won at the cost of purchasing the goods.”

Accordingly, the defendant is the same as the victim.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2014.01.07 2013고단2471

-울산지방법원 2020.07.31 2019고단3364

-인천지방법원 2019.11.14 2019고단5193

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2019.07.24 2019고단59

-제주지방법원 2020.05.15 2019고단2478