logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가합583241
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 108,690,98 for the Plaintiff and the period from December 16, 2014 to August 21, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

2) Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is the owner of the instant accident search vehicle B (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”), and Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. on the instant accident vehicle.

B. At around 23:00 on November 15, 201, the instant accident occurred, Nonparty D (hereinafter “disaster”) was conducting floor cleaning at the site of the construction works for the main urban gas-related connecting work at the Cheong-si city city gas centering around 3:00, but Defendant A did not discover the instant accident and caused an accident that led to the occurrence of the instant accident (hereinafter “instant accident”).

As a result, disaster victims suffered injuries, such as a pelle, a pelle and a pelle to the right, a pelle to the right pelle, a pelle to the right pelle, a pelle to the left pelle, a pelle to the left pelle, and a pelle to the left pelle.

C. Under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid 115,368,40 won for medical care benefits until March 24, 2015 ( = KRW 17,682,420 for Class 2 medical care expenses), KRW 80,960,650 for temporary layoff benefits, KRW 28,338,90 for disability benefits, and KRW 974,290 for the benefit of the latter legacy.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, Defendant A, the driver of the instant accident vehicle, predicted frequent traffic of workers at the site of the main urban gas connecting work site, and was in an accident by checking the front and rear parts of the instant accident vehicle.

arrow