logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.18 2015나2048458
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following payment order shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the whole purport of the pleadings in each of the evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 2-4, evidence No. 5-1, No. 2, evidence No. 6-1, No. 6-2, and evidence No. 1.

1) The Plaintiff is entitled to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

2) Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is the owner of the instant accident search vehicle B (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”), and Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. on the instant accident vehicle.

3) Hero companies Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Yiro companies”)

) From the Government City to the Government, the Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Corporation”) shall carry out the main urban gas connecting work

(i)the Hanjin Urban Gas Co., Ltd. contracted (i.e., its trade name was later changed to S. S.;

hereinafter referred to as "Madmon E. S."

(B) A company that received a subcontract for the instant construction from the Plaintiff is an industrial accident insurance policyholder under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act and the owner of the instant construction work site. B. Defendant A, around November 15, 201, carried out the instant accident at the construction site and carried out the floor cleaning work after the instant accident vehicle (hereinafter “disaster”).

2) An accident that did not discover the U.S. and took place (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”)

A. The occurrence occurred.

As a result, disaster victims suffered injuries, such as a pelle, a pelle and a pelle to the right, a pelle to the right pelle, a pelle to the right pelle, a pelle to the left pelle, a pelle to the left pelle, and a pelle to the left pelle.

C. The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and treated a disaster victim or a disaster victim pursuant to the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.

arrow