A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Before August 30, 2004, the Defendant purchased from G, around August 30, 2004, the name of ASEAN, D, E land 2, the unregistered assembly style board warehouse on F land, and one mushroom cultivation shed, respectively.

Then, around June 11, 2014, I, the owner of the said F land and the wife of H, against C, the Defendant and the Defendant, the ASEAN, for the purpose that “a prefabricated-type warehouse on the F land surface” and “a request to remove the building and deliver the land” was passed at the first instance court by filing a lawsuit for removal of the building, etc. on the said F land surface, and thereafter, at the appellate court, the conciliation was made to the effect that “the Defendant may leave the building from the ground surface, and the Plaintiff may remove the ground.”

Nevertheless, as the defendant does not put the above warehouse within the eviction period, H sent text messages to the defendant two times that "if you leave the warehouse due to the reason that he left the warehouse, H changed the warehouse," and the defendant has always made it possible to remove the warehouse.

“.” The Defendant sent text messages (as of December 30, 2015) and content certification (as of January 5, 2016). However, the Defendant sent false text messages and content certification without warehouse.

After that, H sent to the defendant two copies of the letter, note, document, and content evidence to the effect that “if he does not leave, he will compel execution and claim the cost thereof,” and the defendant sent to H as of February 24, 2016, “in accordance with the law” to H as of February 24, 2016, the goods in the warehouse are not the goods in himself (A and C), and the time of removal according to the ruling of the court.

The certificate of content was sent.

Accordingly, H went to remove the above warehouse on March 6, 2016, and brought about the removal of three chemical parts among the goods in the warehouse, and replaced the locks of the warehouse.

After December 2016, the Defendant.