logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.03.18 2019고단2419
위증
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to two million won, Defendant B, and C, respectively.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 21, 2017, Defendant C was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for perjury, etc. at Jeju District Court on August 22, 2017 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 30, 2016, Defendant C testified with the Jeju District Court on the charge of the foregoing evidence stating, “I would like to bring B’s seal onto Erypt gas in connection with the instant case, including the preparation of qualification specifications and specifications in Defendant B (hereinafter “Seoul District Court Decision”) at the Jeju District Court, on August 26, 2014, Defendant C testified that “I would put D’s seal onto Erypt Management Dong gas, and would put it in a separate seal.” On May 26, 2014, the Defendant was indicted of the non-detained charge of the foregoing evidence, and was tried by the Jeju District Court Decision 2016Da1238 (hereinafter “related case”).

Accordingly, in order to support the testimony of his case in the trial process of the related case, the defendant tried to ask the defendant to make a false testimony to the effect that "the defendant sent the B seal to the gas siren in the resort management operation, and marked his seal at the resort office."

Thus, between August 201 and November 2016, the Defendant had A take the mind of having A make a false testimony by stating that “A, around May 2012, around May 6, 2012, would put B’s seal into the resort, and I would like to consider that B’s seal is affixed at the resort office, and I would like to see the court that B’s seal is affixed at the resort office.”

A, upon the request of the above Defendant, around 15:40 on January 10, 2017, at the Jeju District Court No. 202, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the relevant case and taken an oath after being notified of the right to refuse to testify, and the facts were not revealed. However, the Defendant’s name and seal on the front page (which is recognized as being subsequent to the question).

arrow