A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized evidence No. 3 shall be confiscated.

Nos. 1 and 2 of seized evidence to the victim B.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant conspired to commit the crime of telephone financial fraud and thief by having the victim collect cash at a place designated by the winners of his name through the crime of telephone financial fraud using the so-called “Sphishing” method, and to commit the crime of telephone financial fraud and thief while carrying out the role of collecting cash at the location designated by the winners of his name in accordance with the direction of the

1. Fraud;

A. On October 17, 2019, the victim B made a false statement to the effect that “I will receive money from us to protect the identity and money of the party” by making a phone call misrepresenting the victim’s staff at the prosecutor’s office, and “I will receive money from us to protect the identity and money of the party.”

However, the person in poor name was not an employee of the prosecutor's office, and there was no intention or ability to receive the money of the victim.

Nevertheless, on October 17, 2019, the person who was unaware of his name had the victim deceiving the victim, and caused the victim to withdraw KRW 19,590,00 from the account of the victim, and had the victim withdraw KRW 19,590,00,00, and then had the cash withdrawn at 10,000 from the storage box of the goods in the Daecheon-ro 351, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Do Do Do 351, and set up a number of the number of the winners of name and notify the victims of the number of the number of the non-name. On October 12: 17, 2019, the defendant collected the cash that the victim left in the custody of the goods in accordance with the orders of the non-name boxes

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the staff of scaming assistance in the name of the defendant, received money from the victim by deceiving the victim.

B. On October 22, 2019, the victim victim D’s false statement was made to the effect that “the victim’s false statement is likely to pose a risk of property due to fraud, to protect the party’s property, and to keep goods by withdrawing cash.”