logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.01.10 2019고단2897
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence 2 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name-free persons misrepresented the public prosecutor, the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, and made a false statement to the victims, such as “the amount in the account shall have to be withdrawn and confirmed because the current financial account was involved in an offense.” This role as the “total liability” of the telephone financial fraud (the so-called “the so-called “scaming”), which has the victims bring cash to a certain place, by receiving the cash from the victims at a certain place, and the Defendant conspired with each other to commit the crime of telephone financial fraud by having the victims commit the crime of telephone financial fraud (the so-called “the so-called “Scaming”), and the Defendant, in compliance with the orders of the above persons in distress, sent the victims or cash, and transfer them to the account designated by the victims, and take charge of the “collection measures”

1. On October 31, 2019, when the victim B was committed with a false statement, that “The Seoul Central District Inspection Corporation is established in the name of the party, and is under investigation. It is necessary to withdraw cash serial numbers in order to prove that the victim is a victim. He/she will delete the loan records in the absence of any problem after confirmation.” The victim made a withdrawal of cash from the account in the name of the victim to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and made the victim enter the account in the name of the victim, and made the victim enter the account in the future with E-S. located in E-S. in E-S. D with money.

On November 1, 2019, at around 16:44, the Defendant: (a) completed the victim’s false statement at the end of the deceased’s name, as seen above, as if he were an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service; and (b) received from the victim KRW 27 million in cash, according to the direction of the deceased’s name.

However, in fact, the defendant and the person who was not the prosecutor or the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service did not investigate the crime related to the victim.

arrow