logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.06.16 2016고단125
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On May 27, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escape vehicle) in the Sungnam branch support of Suwon branch, and was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul High Court on December 9, 201, and was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of assault at the Daejeon District Court on December 28, 2012, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on May 16, 2013.

[2] On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on March 7, 2016, 2016, at Ekbook operated by the Victim D (W, 39 years of age), the Defendant: (b) viewed the Defendant as “F, an employee,” and (c) started to work for thener; (d) “the victim,” “the victim,” and (e) the instant weather year; and (e) v. h., “the victim, who, in his hand, takes the victim’s bath, takes the victim’s head debt, and sleeps the victim’s head debt, etc., by not later than 23:56 on the same day.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as salt ties and tensions, which require treatment for about 21 days, and interfered with the victim's carpet business by force of approximately 6 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Facts】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, G, and F;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. On-site photographs and CCTV screen pictures (the criminal records as indicated in the judgment);

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc. (A);

1. A criminal investigation report (verification of repeated crime) (the defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the defendant has a trace of the victim's head collection, but there is no friendly fact about the victim's head.

However, in full view of the statements consistent with the specific contents of the victim and witness F, on-site CCTV images, the first police reports, etc., the defendant can fully recognize the fact that he/she has a friendship with the victim.

Defendant

And his defense counsel's above assertion is rejected.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow