The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who was expelled on April 19, 2017, due to a dispute with a pastor, among those who were going to C church located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for 28 years.

On December 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around December 14, 2016, in the event that D (a member of the above C church) sent a church ceremony and advertised, and thereafter, (b) followed by the believers, and (c) in the situation where the accompanists took the right to speak, the Defendant changed the opportunity to speak to oneself; (d) forcedly closed the lids of the Pianno to prevent the flids of the Pianian; and (e) went to the platform.

The noise interfered with the towing by putting knife and speaking unrelated to the worship.

2. Determination:

A. Interference with worship as stipulated in Article 158 of the Criminal Act refers to a crime of interference with worship as a legal interest in the protection of the peace and religion of the general public. Thus, it is established only in cases of interference with worship or the preparation stage closely indivisible in time with worship (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do5296, Feb. 1, 2008, etc.).

B. The Defendant and his defense counsel had committed an act of entering the facts charged after the completion of worship.

The argument is asserted.

In light of the following circumstances, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant’s act indicated in the facts charged was conducted in the course of worship or the preparation of worship, based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The defendant's act was conducted through D's advertisement and map, and the D' and C's members of the C's church completed a door while the P's union was in operation.

According to the recording of No. 12 of the evidence (the conversation content of D, A, etc.), D is "C" at the last of an advertisement.

It will be able to go through the same way and the end.

The phrase “,” and thereafter, the attitude and cycle of the Defendant’s participation took place.

According to the evidence, the defendant's advertisement is made even after the end of the term, while the piano's annual share price is being made.