All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of legal principles or factual errors);

A. (i) It is difficult to find out whether the contents of W’s notification reached the side of the church as to the facts charged of the instant case Nos. 1 and 2, and it was not for interference with W’s towing but for natural process following the change of the method of worship.

Even if W was notified of the worship, the church worship also constitutes the subject of protection of the obstruction of worship.

Article 22(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall not apply to the Defendants’ acts.

B. (i) As to Article 3 of the facts charged in the instant case, according to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the Defendants sufficiently recognized that the Defendants interfered with the worship on the side of the church at the preparation stage of the worship and time close to the worship.

The Defendants’ instant act cannot be deemed not to have been done at the preparation stage of the worship solely on the ground that the instant act was planned in advance and there was a conflict between the church and W from the morning on the day of the crime.

2. As to the assertion on Articles 1 and 2 of the facts charged of this case

A. The summary of the facts charged is a person who belongs to the so-called “W” (hereinafter referred to as “W”), who is against the members of the U.S. association, who are members of the U.S. association, and is claiming his retirement. Defendant A is a member of the U church and W standing adviser, Defendant B is the head and the two vice-chairpersons of W1st, Defendant C is an internal collector and W financial officer, Defendant D is an internal collector, Defendant E is an internal collector, Defendant E is an internal collection agent, Defendant F’s collection agent, Defendant X’s W secretary of X X’s distribution, Defendant H is a general collection agent, Defendant L is a gathering agent, Defendant L L is a general collection agent, Defendant P is a collection agent, Defendant P is a collection agent, Defendant Q Q’s collection agent, Defendant Q, Defendant R, Defendant S is a general collection agent, and Defendant T is a new collection agent.

W. On the contrary, not more than those who follow the policy of U.S. senior wood companies V wood companies.