logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.12.23 2020고단6393
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:35 on June 20, 2020, the Defendant assaulted D and alcohol at “C” located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, and the Defendant expressed a bath to D, thereby assaulting D’s son F (ma, 21 years of age) the victim’s victim F (ma, 21 years of age) and Sivia attached to D, one time at the victim’s buck.

2. On June 20, 2020, at around 06:00, the Defendant expressed a 112-report to the effect that “the Defendant was involved in assault,” and that H expressed an identification card to identify the Defendant, the background leading up to the G District at the Incheon Central Police Station G District, which was dispatched upon receipt of a 112-report, the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant would be frighted, frighted, fright, and fright to fright,” and that he expressed a desire that “the Defendant would be fright to fright, fright, and fright to fright to fright to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assault.” The Defendant boomed h’s face and fright to fright, fright, and fright to fright to fright to fright the Defendant’s face and fright to fright to the police station.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Video CDs, such as the witness F, J, E’s written statement of each police statement of the witness H, and I (the Defendant is dissatisfied with the part of the instant facts charged. However, according to each of the evidence in the judgment below, the Defendant’s act of assaulting the said victim on or around June 20, 2020. The Defendant’s act cannot be deemed a legitimate act under the Criminal Act solely on the ground that the parties dispute each other, such as the Defendant’s assaulting the victim F and her behavior against the victim F, and the Defendant’s act of assaulting the victim F. The Defendant’s act cannot be deemed as a legitimate act, etc. under the Criminal Act.)

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Punishment;

arrow