Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On March 12, 2013, from around 04:00 to 06:00 on March 12, 2013, the Defendant reported that “F” located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City was drinking alcohol, and “B” reported that “A person with a thickness sick sick sick sick sick sick, sick sick sick sick sick.”

Accordingly, the police officer H and police officer belonging to the Seoul Gwanak Police Station G District was dispatched to the site, and the same day.

3. At around 06:20 on December 12, 196, the above police officers alleged that B and D had suffered damage to each other, and the H and police officers in the situation where B and D again expressed their desire to arrest a flagrant offender for the crime of assault, and at the same time notified them of their right to refuse to make statements and right to appoint a defense counsel. At the same time, B and C expressed their desire to “I Chewing” to the Inspector H, and she took two times the chest of H in the drinking.

The Inspector notified that H would arrest a flagrant offender, including the suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and that B refused to arrest a police officer in the face of a police officer, while refusing to arrest a police officer in the face of a police officer, "I requested to provide assistance to H, K, slope L, or patrol officer." In addition, I called J, K, slope L, or patrol officer for the background leading up to the police officer's assignment.

B은 지원 나온 여자경찰관인 순경 M이 재차 피의자로서의 권리 고지 후 체포하려 하자 바닥에 드러누운 채 경위 H, 순경 I 등의 다리 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

The security guards H and patrolmen, etc. causing B to go on the patrol vehicle and preventing B from getting off his arms and getting off his arms to the patrol vehicle, and the Defendant, who was engaged in the same patrol, carried his arms and pushed off his arms to the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, in collusion with B, C, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the investigation of crimes by Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, K, K, Ha, and Ma.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the accused, the D, N,O, C, or B;

1. Application of the police statement law to H 1.