logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2015.10.14 2015고단93
절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor of four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stolen 20 iron bars 160,000 won in the market price managed by the Victim F, who was placed in the said camping site in the field of the E’s construction site located in Gyeongnam-gun, G freight trucking around 160,000 won, in which the Defendant: (b) loaded 20 iron bars around 160,000 won at the night; and (c) stolen them.

In addition, from October 5, 2014 to October 5, 2014, the Defendant stolen a total of 34,830,000 won of the market price owned or managed by the victims over a total of 29 times, such as the attached Table 1.

B. On March 2014, the Defendant was driving a G cargo vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from the vicinity of the construction site of E located in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, to the “I” located in the same military H.

In addition, from that time until October 5, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo without obtaining a driver's license over a total of 19 times, as shown in the attached Table 2.

2. Defendant B is a person who engages in the business of collecting and selling scrap metal in the name of “I” at H of the G of the G of the G.

On March 3, 2014, the Defendant purchased 20m iron bars equivalent to 160,000 won in the market price managed by the victim F, who was stolen by the Defendant F, from the Defendant F, from the Defendant F.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the sales business of scrap metal, has a duty of care to verify whether the defendant is stolen by properly examining the details of acquisition and sale of the above scrap metal, the motive for sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and purchased the said iron bars by negligence, which neglected the judgment on the stolen goods.

In addition, the Defendant from that time until October 5, 2014.

arrow