logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.11.19 2013고단367
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, rhythizing the facts charged without changing the indictment and recognizing the facts charged.

On August 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in the resident support of the Daegu District Court on August 20, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 28, 2013.

1. On October 2, 201, at around 19:55, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.051% in the section of approximately 5km in the middle of the white village in the front of the white village in the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the settlement.

2. Around 14:00 on July 13, 2013, the Defendant driven the said cargo without obtaining a driver’s license at a section of approximately 3 km from the 3km to the road front of a breakwater located in C, which is located adjacent to the breakwater of the coast guard.

3. On July 13, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) even though there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving of the said cargo while under the influence of alcohol as stated in the foregoing paragraph (2), such as the Defendant snicking, smelling, snicking, snicking, snicking, etc., on the face of the Defendant, he did not comply with the alcohol level measurement by police officials E.

4. On July 13, 2013, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) at the front of the said D police box around 14:30, the Defendant expressed that the police officer F, who belongs to the said D police box, arrested the Defendant G, who is a daily motion of the Defendant, was in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, arrested the Defendant into the warrant of arrest; (b) failed to depart from the police vehicle by opening the police station; and (c) failed to depart from the police vehicle on his hand on the ground that the said F prevented him from carrying the vehicle; (d) pushed the F’s body on his hand on the ground that the said F would restrain it, and (e) expressed that the F would be “crops, to go to the f’s face.”

arrow