logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.05.14 2014고단677
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 677] On May 16, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with D, posted a letter stating that “the sale of galthal galthal galthal galthal galthal galthal galthal galthalian on the Internet galthal galthal galthal galthalm,” and made a false statement with D that “the transfer of 1.7

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the cell phone to the victim even if the victim received the damage amount.

The defendant received 170,000 won from the victim to the new bank account (F) in the name of the defendant and acquired it by fraud.

In collusion with D, the Defendant received a total of 1,50,000 won from victims over a total of 10 times from the victims through the aforesaid method, as shown in the list of crimes, from the above date and time to July 22, 2013.

[2014 Highest 763]

1. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with D, posted an article stating that “a gallonian No. 1 will be sold” on the Internet NAVV in IPC adjacent to H station located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and made a false statement to the victimJ that “a gallon No. 1 will be sent when remitting KRW 140,00,000 to the victimJ.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the cell phone to the victim even if the victim received the damage amount.

The defendant received 140,000 won from the victim to the NongHyup Bank (K) account in the name of the defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On October 5, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with D, posted a letter that “a sale of gallonian 1” on the Internet NAVV Liber, in collusion with D, and made a false statement that “a transfer of 140,000 won to the victim L who contacted gallon 1” was “a transfer of gallon gallon 1”.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the cell phone to the victim even if the victim received the damage amount.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow