Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the 'E Child Care Center' located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

The defendant knew that the State or a local government subsidized all or some of the expenses incurred in infant care services, such as expenses for the establishment of child care centers, personnel expenses of infant care teachers (including substitute teachers), expenses for excessive infant care, etc., as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and, from January to October 2013, 2013, the defendant entered F, his/her dependent, into the infant care teacher of the child care center in the infant care integration system.

In fact, F did not work for the essential working hours (from 19:30 to 21:30) for which a part-time childcare teacher is obliged to work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant entered F into the Integrated Child Care Computer System as a child care teacher and falsely registered the employment information as a "long-time childcare teacher who must work from 19:30 to 21:30,000 won of subsidies, such as overtime childcare teachers' allowances, etc., in the name of the E Child Care Center, and received subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Current status, etc. of faculty members of E child-care centers, details of payment of long-term continuous working allowances, details of payment of personnel expenses for overtime of hours, etc., and details of payment of basic

1. Guidelines for infant care budget;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the investigation report (Attachment to the current status of the E child care center’s extended child care), the current status of the child extended during the hours, and the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel. The Defendant and the defense counsel, while working for the F as the “long-time Infant Care Teachers”, left from the site of the f for the duties training on every day from March 2013 to November 2013. At the time of the F’s secession from the childcare site, other persons, such as F, “long-time Infant Care Teachers for the Work Allowances Support”, such as F, substitute the F’s lawful work. The Defendant