logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.08 2017고정1594
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is a golf game assistant (glar) in the golf course in the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, who is engaged in the operation of electric car clubs using the glar, etc.

The Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident, such as suspending the electric cart in advance, if there is any other person by checking well before the direction of the electric cart in driving the electric cart by using the caps, etc.

Nevertheless, at around 07:45 on November 7, 2016, the Defendant, while driving a electric cart in front of the direction of the electric cart in front of the previous cart while driving the electric cart on the electric cart on the electric car line at around 10th of the above golf course at around 07:45, 2016, did not immediately stop the electric cart.

“Along with the fault of manipulating the caps at the latest, it was impossible to stop the electric cart before the collision to the victim, which led to the collision between the victim’s right-side suprehion and the right-side surd of the electric cart.

As above, Defendant 2 suffered injury, such as damage to the right legle, which requires treatment for about 28 days by occupational negligence, to the victim.

2. On November 23, 2017, after the institution of public prosecution for a crime of non-prosecution for judgment (Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents) (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)

arrow