201Ba235186 Compensation (as referred to in this paragraph)

○ Kim

Attorney Yoon Jung-chul et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant

GS Construction Corporation

Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Jungmunro 5 537

The representative director**, Hu*, Hu*, Hu**

Attorney Lee Jae-won, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Attorney Kim Jong-sung

April 4, 2013

May 9, 2013

1. The defendant pays to the plaintiff 10, 498, 655 won with 5% interest per annum from June 17, 2009 to May 9, 2013, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. 9/10 of the costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, and the remainder by the Defendant.

4. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the complaint of this case from June 17, 2009 to the delivery date of the complaint of this case.

shall pay 5% per annum and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person who operates a golf club located in the Namcheon-si, Namcheon-do, Yannam-do, 29 - 1 located in ELrian City, and is a user of Gadi ○, and the Plaintiff was waiting for golf games by receiving support from ○, etc. from the above consortium with Gadi ○, etc.

B. On June 17, 2009: (a) around 00, the Plaintiff: (b) opened in the vicinity of the above consortium, and opened in the e-electronic leading wire-type golf club (hereinafter “the instant cart”) with a cell phone and opened up about 5 meters of the instant cart to the right gate; (c) opened the instant cart to the right gate; and (d) cut down to the right gate; and (e) cut down with the upper end of the instant cart, and cut down with the upper end of the upper end of the instant cart, and cut down the shape of the 6 parts of the upper part of the e-mailbromoth of the upper part (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap's evidence 3 (including numbers), Gap's evidence 6 (including numbers), Gap's video, witness's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The parties' assertion

The Plaintiff neglected to check the safety condition of the instant cart or to have glard, etc. operate the instant cart safely even though he had a duty of care to do so, and caused the instant accident to be caused by mistake, such as glarcing and driving the instant cart or accelerating the instant cart, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

The defendant asserted that the accident of this case was caused by the plaintiff's procedure for the speed cryp of the carart of this case, and that it was not an accident of the cart of this case or the sudden dust of the cart of this case, and thus, the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim.

나. 인정사실 ( 1 ) 캐디 윤○○은 이 사건 사고 직전 창고에서 1번홀 티박스 부근까지 이 사건 카트를 수동으로 운전한 후 시동을 끄지 않은 상태로 내렸다 . ( 2 ) 이 사건 사고 당시 캐디 윤○○은 강●●의 티샷을 보기 위하여 강●● 뒤에서 있었고 이 사건 카트는 캐디 윤○○의 오른쪽 뒤쪽에 세워져 있었다 . ( 3 ) 이 사건 사고 당시 강●●는 티샷을 하기 위해 자세를 잡고 있었는데, 이 사건 카트가 갑자기 오른쪽 언덕으로 약 5m 올라갔다가 다시 약 5m 내려온 상태에서 조금 더 진행하다가 멈추었고, 이 사건 카트의 뒷좌석에는 원고의 골프채가 놓여져 있었다 . ( 4 ) 이 사건 카트에는 앞과 뒤를 연결하는 프레임에 천장과 앞창만 있고 양옆에는 프레임도 문도 없으며, 2인용 앞좌석 양옆에서 굽어져 ( 이 부위가 앞좌석의 손잡이 역할을 한다 ) 등받이 뒤쪽으로 연결된 철제 바가 뒷좌석 승객들을 위한 손잡이로 설치되어 있고, 3인용 뒷좌석 양옆에는 역삼각형 철제 바가 뒷좌석 가장자리를 승객들을 위한 손잡이가 설치되어 있으며, 운전석 아래쪽의 오른편에 가속페달이 있는데 운전석과 조수석 사이에는 칸막이가 없으며, 이 사건 사고 당시 비가 내려 뒤쪽 골프채를 놓는곳에 차단막을 설치한 상태였다 .

( 5 ) 이 사건 카트는 시동을 켠 상태에서는 수동모드 또는 자동모드로 운전이 모두 가능하고 모드 전환은 리모콘이나 운전석 좌우의 버튼으로 조작이 가능하다 .

In the case of conversion into an automatic mortar, the instant cart will immediately stop by using the ' belt belt belt', and immediately proceed along the Kat-ray, to a specific point (Ap points) installed in the Kat-ferry (Ap points). The automatic bust will stop only by the rier operation, even if the cart takes a speed, and if another cart turns on the starting side of the direction, it will stop automatically by detecting it.

When converting into a manual, the instant cart may proceed with speed pedal, stop after driving at a speed of 1 to 2 meters at the speed of speed at the speed of speed, and operate the cart even if it deviates from the cart leading line.

(6) The Defendant instructed Dogras to turn on the starting-dong in order to prevent the collision between electric vehicles when providing safety education on the operation of the instant car.

[Ground of recognition] The statements Nos. 1, 3, and 5 of Eul, Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including branch numbers), Eul's video, witness leap ○'s testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

C. Determination

위 인정사실에 ① 이 사건 사고 무렵 이 사건 카트에서 ' 띠띠띠 ' 소리가 났다는 정황이 없으므로 이 사건 사고 당시 이 사건 카트는 수동상태였던 것으로 추정되는 점 , ② 강●●가 아직 티샷을 하지 않았고 이 사건 카트는 캐디 윤○○의 오른쪽 약간 뒤쪽에 세워져 있었으므로 이 사건 카트가 앞으로 진행한 때에 캐디 윤○○의 오른쪽을 지나게 되어 캐디 윤○○이 이 사건 카트의 왼쪽 옆모습을 바라보았을 가능성이 있고 , 실제로 캐디 윤○○은 원고가 운전석 옆에 탑승하여 전화통화를 하고 있다가 이 사건 카트가 언덕을 내려올 무렵 떨어지는 것을 목격하였다고 진술한 점, ③ 이 사건 카트가 진행한 언덕에는 카트유도선이 깔려 있지 않았으므로 이 사건 카트의 진행 경로로 보아 리모콘 오작동으로 인한 사고로 보기 어려운 점, ④ 이 사건 카트는 원고가 떨어진 후 조금 더 진행하다가 멈춘 점, ⑤ 원고의 골프채가 뒷좌석에서 발견되었으나 이로써 곧바로 원고가 뒷좌석에 앉았다고 단정할 수 없고, 원고가 전화통화를 위하여 이 사건 카트에 앉으면서 공간이 넓은 뒷좌석에 골프채를 놓았을 가능성을 배제할 수 없는 점 등을 더하여 보면, 이 사건 사고 당시 캐디 윤혜영이 이 사건 카트를 오작동하였거나 이 사건 카트가 급발진하였다고 보기 어렵고, 오히려 사고 당시 원고가 운전석 옆에서 전화통화를 하던 중 실수로 운전석 아래쪽의 가속페달을 밟음으로써 이 사건 카트가 진행한 것으로 봄이 상당하다 .

However, considering the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively considering the whole arguments, i.e., the defendant ordered g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g. g., g., g., g. g., g.

D. Limitation on liability

다만 이 사고의 경위 및 결과, 상해의 정도, 이 사건 사고의 직접적인 원인은 원고가 실수로 이 사건 카트의 가속페달을 밟은 것인 점, 이 사건 사고 당시 원고의 일행이 티샷을 하는 중이어서 캐디 윤○○으로서는 원고가 이 사건 카트로 가는 것을 예상하기 어려웠던 점 등 이 사건 변론에 나타난 여러 사정을 참작하여, 피고의 책임을 40 % 로 제한한다 .

3. Scope of liability for damages

In addition to the following separate statements, each item of the attached table for calculating the amount of damages shall be the same as each item of the attached table for calculating the amount of damages, and the period for calculating the amount for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but less than the last month and less than won shall be discarded. The current value calculation at the time of the accident shall be governed by the method of deducting the interim interest at the rate of 5/12

(a) Personal information on lost income (1): as stated in the column of “basic matters” in the annexed sheet of calculation of damages; (2) occupation and income;

At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserts that he had earned income of KRW 2,079,166 ( = 24,950,000 in = 12 months) in the course of operating his superior, and that he had earned income of KRW 3,166,66 in the month ( = total amount of KRW 38,000,000 in / 12 months) as an employee of * 3,166 in the month.

However, if the victim of a tort concurrently engages in business falling under two or more sources at the time of the accident, in light of the nature of each business or the type of work, etc., his/her business affairs are compatible independently and independently. In addition, if the victim is not able to concentrate on only one of his/her business affairs, the actual income of the victim may be calculated by individually assessing and adding up all the amounts of loss of income of each type of business (Supreme Court Decision 199Da11999).

26. 선고 99다18008 판결 참조 ), 그렇지 않은 경우에는 각 업종의 수입상실액을 합산하여 산정할 수 없는바, 이 사건에서 보건대, 갑 제4, 5호증 ( 가지번호 포함 ) 의 각 기재 , 이 법원의 구로세무서장, 용산세무서장에 대한 각 사실조회결과에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고는 이 사건 사고 무렵 서울 용산구 * * 동 * * - * 에서 ' * * 상사 ' 라는 상호로 광산토목기자재 및 중기 임대업을 운영하고, 처 윤■■ 명의로 같은 곳 1층을 본점 소재지로 하는 주식회사 * * 광기를 설립하여 같은 영업을 하였던 사실, 2008. 무렵 세무서에 신고한 * * 상사 운영에 의한 사업소득은 22, 249, 959원이고, 주식회사 * * 광기로부터 지급받은 급여 총액은 38, 000, 000원인 사실을 인정할 수 있으나, * * 상사와 주식회사 * * 광기의 업종과 사업장소재지가 같아 양 업무가 서로 독립적이어서 양립 가능하다 .

In light of the fact that it is difficult to see that the Plaintiff actually dealt with the income, etc. of another company after considering the fact that the Plaintiff’s business income and earned income cannot be calculated by aggregating the above business income and earned income, and that it is difficult to specify the portion of the Plaintiff’s actual labor contribution from the above business income as much as possible, it is reasonable to see the Plaintiff’s income as KRW 3,166, and 666.

(3) The period of hospitalized treatment;

The Plaintiff, from June 17, 2009 to July 10, 2009, the date of the instant accident, at the Yongsan Hospital at the Central University from the date of the instant accident to the date of the instant accident, from the date following that to July 27, 2009, from the date following that to the date of the annual charter from the date following that to July 27, 2009.

10.1. From October 5, 2009 to December 26, 2009 to the Yongsan Hospital of the Central University, hospitalized for 83 days at the Yongsan Hospital of the Central University, from January 28, 2010 to February 6, 2010, respectively hospitalized for 200 days at the Yongsan Hospital of the National University, respectively, for 10 days, from January 28, 201 to February 6, 201, and received hospitalized treatment for 20 days in total, for the convenience of calculation.

17. It shall be deemed that hospitalized treatment was received from January 2, 2010.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence 3 and 7 (including number), the purport of the entire argument, (4) the latter disability and the labor disability loss rate (A) the plaintiff has permanently lost labor ability of 7% due to the right upper throke, (B) the plaintiff has permanently lost labor ability of 7% due to the ground of the upper throke. (Armobr disability assessment table - II - 1/2, and occupational coefficient 6) (b) the labor disability loss rate

(1) Period of hospitalization: 100%

(2) From the following day to the end of the operation period: 7%.

[Ground of recognition] The court's commission of physical appraisal to the director of the KITol University Seoul Geon Hospital and the purport of the entire pleadings (5): 65,957,539 won (as stated in the column of "total amount of lost income" in the attached Form of damages calculation) -

(b) The king medical expenses;

The plaintiff alleged that he spent KRW 21,00,000 for the treatment expenses, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

(c) Set-off of negligence: The defendant's scope of responsibility 40% 26,383,015 won ( = 65,957,539 won x 0.4);

(d) Mutual aid:

The defendant paid to the plaintiff** 20,884, 360 won as advance payment for damages paid to the plaintiff

[Grounds for recognition] Eul 4 Eul's statement and the purport of the whole pleading

E. The reasons for consolation money (1) : All the circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the developments leading up to the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s age, the process of injury and treatment, and the degree of disability in the aftermath: 5,00,000 won; and

F. Sub-committee

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 10,498,65 ( = 26,383,015 won - KRW 20,884, 360 + KRW 5,00,000) and damages for delay calculated at each rate of 20% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from June 17, 2009, which is the date when the instant accident occurred until May 9, 2013, which is the date when the instant judgment was rendered, to the Defendant’s claim as to the scope and existence of the obligation.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Gin-soo