beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,900,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 29, 2014 to March 31, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At around 00:16, June 29, 2014, B, around 00:0:16, 2014, the instant accident occurred: (a) was set up between the first entrance and the platform at the direction of the running of the train at the 237 Masan Line, which was operated by the Defendant, and a walked at the right edge of the platform, and the body was laid down to the direction of the platform; (b) B was unfolded from the line to the platform on the platform; and (c) around 00:19 on the same day, the train was set up between the first entrance and the platform on the left side of the running direction of the train at the 2237 Masan Line.
On the same day, at around 00:20, around 112 and 119 of the same day, the C service personnel belonging to the Defendant reported to 10:20,000, and around 00:26 of the same day, the first responded to the scene of the instant accident and rescued B, but B was transferred to the emergency room of the C service center of the Gyeonggi-do Medical Center, and died due to scarcity damage during the period of 0:50 on the same day.
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). (b)
At the time of the instant accident, the C Station platform was not installed for the purpose of preventing the crash accident. At the time of the instant accident, the C Station platform was installed for the purpose of preventing the crash accident, and there was only four employees, including the vice president D, in the C Station at the time of the instant accident. At the time of the instant accident, four employees, including the vice president D, were working in the C Station. One of them was during the rest for the new wall work, and there was no separate safety personnel or patrol in order to prevent safety accidents in the platform.
C. The deceased’s heir B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was divorced at the time of the instant accident, and there was the Plaintiff as co-inheritors, E, F, and son. However, E and F have renounced inheritance, and the Plaintiff inherited the deceased’s property solely upon the Plaintiff’s acceptance of qualified acceptance.