Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant Korea Rail Network Authority (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Rail Network Authority”)
Defendant Corporation is a corporation established on December 31, 2003 by comprehensively succeeding the organization and duties related to railroad facilities among the duties of the Korea High-Speed Railroad Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea High-Speed Railroad Corporation") under the former Railroad Industry Development Act and the former High-Speed Railroad Corporation Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea High-Speed Railroad Corporation") and the former High-Speed Railroad Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea High-Speed Railroad Corporation").
A) The implementer of a project to promote and fire fighting of horse lines is the operator of a project to promote and fire fighting of ships, and Defendant Crew Airport Railroad Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Airport Railroad”) and “Defendant Airport Railroad.”
The trade name was changed from Incheon International Airport Railroad Co., Ltd to the airport railway Co., Ltd. and the defendant airport railway.
) The operator of the Incheon International Airport Railroad Construction Project and Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Spanco”).
On December 24, 2003, the construction work of Section 1 (the construction work from the defendant airport railway, the construction work from the Yongsan mountain, the work of the defendant airport railway and the work of the defendant airport railway, the construction work of Section 1 (the construction work from the defendant airport railway), and the construction work of Section 1 (the construction work from the defendant airport railway to the defendant airport railway on December 23, 2003) was conducted concurrently.
2) On the part of the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Railroad Corporation”) which has contracted for construction, the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Railroad Corporation”) entrusted the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Railroad Corporation”) with the transportation of the railway station in the C Station located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (excluding the transportation of the railway vehicles that transport the cargo by using the railway vehicles among the transportation of the railway vehicles, the remainder of the transportation of the cargo, the cargo temporarily stored in the storage space, and the receipt or delivery of the cargo between the consignor and the consignor) and the Seoul Railroad Corporation entrusted the transportation of the cargo to the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Railroad Corporation”) with the operation of the Seoul Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “instant business office”) located in the Korea Railroad Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Railroad Corporation”) by entering into a contract for the use of the railway site and a lease contract, and the Plaintiff entrusted the Korea Railroad Corporation with the operation of the business office (hereinafter “the