The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered (3 million won in penalty and 900,000 won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. The decision-making act of arranging sexual traffic is recognized as having great social harm, such as undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and is in need of strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture. Meanwhile, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit, on the grounds that the defendant's conviction is recognized, and there is no criminal conviction other than twice a fine due to the crime committed against the defendant, and the period of the sexual traffic brokerage business is relatively short and the profits therefrom are no longer high. In addition, considering various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too small and is not unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.