The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The penalty of a fine of KRW 4 million imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the facts charged in the instant case and against the mistake, that the period of engaging in the business of arranging sexual traffic is relatively short and that the profit therefrom is not high, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm, such as undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus, need to be strict in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture. The Defendant has a criminal record of the same punishment once, there is no special change in circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there is no other change in circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there is no other unfair punishment even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant as seen earlier, since the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.