The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the observation of protection, and the community service order of 120 hours) is deemed to be too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic is not so much socially disadvantaged, such as undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and there is a need to strictize it in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the fact that the defendant has been punished twice for the same kind of crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) appears to have been relatively long; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, circumstances, circumstances after the instant crime; and (d) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit as it is too unab

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.