1. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a long term of one year and eight months;

Seized evidence 1, 2, and 5 shall be confiscated.

2...

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and the defense counsel argued that the Defendant did not have any awareness that the Defendant conspiredd with the Defendant to commit the crime of licensing with his nameless boxes, etc. and did not have any awareness that he was involved in the crime of licensing, and that he gave guidance to the Defendant B on the way to the Defendant, and that he did not have any net in the surrounding area, and that the facts charged cannot be acknowledged. However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that Defendant A’s conspiracy to commit the crime of licensing and the network for Defendant B was sufficiently proven.

Although it is difficult to see the defendant himself, there was a little fact that the defendant B was in an illegal heart in the investigative agency and this court.

As long as determined by the person, dolusent intention about the crime of fraud shall be recognized, and the act of accompanying the defendant B, such as providing guidance on the way to commit the crime, may be sufficiently assessed as aiding and abetting the crime.

The facts charged against Defendant A (joint principal offender in each crime of fraud) constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, should be pronounced not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but as long as the Defendant found that each crime of aiding and abetting fraud, which is one of such crimes, is guilty, the judgment does not separately be pronounced not guilty in the text. Defendant B conspired to commit the crime of aiding and abetting fraud by receiving the amount of damage from the victim who suffered from the singing of the singish phone and delivering the amount of damage to the singish employee upon receiving the order from the singish employee. The Defendant B conspired to commit the crime of aiding and abetting the singish with the singish employee in the name of the singish.

1. On October 11, 2018, the above person who was not the victim’s name refers to a false call from the victim C at a place where it is not a place where it is located and “AD prosecutor of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor’s Office is a D public prosecutor of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor’s Office, which is established under the name of the victim, should be investigated because the head of the passbook was involved in the crime, but if the money in the victim’s passbook is withdrawn in cash and delivered to the head of the gold-free office,