2010Gohap28 Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), previous

Violation of the Act on Financial Transactions

OO, E-Commerce

Residential Suwon City

Suwon-si of reference domicile

○ ○

Attorney OOO, OO,OO

April 23, 2010

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Leave (Fraud);

피고인은 2009. 2. 경부터 ○○네트워크, ●●네트워크, □□□네트워크, △△네트워크 , ⑦⑦ 네트워크, ▲▲▲, 00 등 7개의 상호로 ○○텔레콤, ♤♤♤ 등 전기통신업자가 제공하는 무선 네트워크망을 이용하여 무선인터넷 콘텐츠를 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들에게 전송하여 이를 다운받은 휴대폰 사용자로부터 무선인터넷 콘텐츠 이용요금을 휴대폰 사용요금에 포함하여 결제되게 하는 방식으로 콘텐츠 제공 사업을 영위하였다 .

피고인은 이와 같이 무선인터넷 콘텐츠를 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들에게 전송하여 그들로 하여금 그 콘텐츠에 접속하게 함에 있어, 사실은 그 콘텐츠의 내용이 중국의 인터넷 ▣▣▣▣ 블로그에서 캡처한 여성들의 사진 15 ~ 20장을 모아둔 것으로 그 콘텐츠의 내용과 그 콘텐츠의 구입비용이 2, 700 ~ 2, 990원에 이른다는 사실을 알면 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들이 그 콘텐츠를 이용하지 않을 것을 알고, 마치 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들의 친구 등 지인들이 사진을 보낸 것처럼 가장하여 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들을 무선네트워크망으로 유인한 후 피고인이 제공하는 무선인터넷 콘텐츠 사진이 이용요금이 부과되지 않은 지인이 보낸 사진으로 오인한 불상의 휴대폰 사용자들이 그 사진을 클릭하는 순간 2, 700 ~ 2, 990원의 무선콘텐츠 사용요금이 그 휴대폰 사용자들의 휴대폰 요금에 부과되도록 하여 재산상 이익을 취득하려고 마음먹었다 .

피고인은 2009. 11. 7. 14 : 18경 경기 수원시 소재 피고인의 주거지에서 문자 발송 대행업체인 OOOO ( www. * * * * * *. co. kr ) 을 이용하여 피해자 □□□의 휴대폰 ( 010 - * * * * - * * * * ) 으로 마치 피해자의 지인이 사진을 발송한 것처럼 가장하여 ' 고객님께 전달된 포토서비스 ( 1 ) 건 확인 ~ [ YN ] 연결을 시도하시겠습니까 ? [ 연결 ] ' 이라는 문자 메시지를 발송하여 이에 속은 피해자로 하여금 [ 확인 ] 키를 눌러 무선네트워크망에 접속하여 피고인이 제공하는 무선인터넷 콘텐츠 서비스를 이용요금이 부과되지 않는 피해자의 지인이 보낸 사진으로 오인하여 사진보기 서비스를 클릭하게 하여 즉시 피해자에게 정보이용료 명목으로 2, 990원이 부과되게 하여 동액 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득한 것을 비롯하여, 2009. 5. 28. 경부터 12. 31. 경까지 피고인의 위 주거지에서 이와 같은 방법으로 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 ●●네트워크, □□□네트워크, ○○ 네트워크, △△네트워크, ⑦⑦ 네트워크, ▲▲▲, 00 등 7개 업체 명의로 불특정 다수의 휴대폰 사용자에게 문자메시지를 무작위로 발송하여 이에 속은 피해자 302, 925명으로부터 합계금 855, 481, 670원을 결제하게 하여 동액 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하였다 .

As such, the Defendant habitually acquired property gains from others.

2. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

A. On February 16, 2009, the Defendant had a post office account (******************) opened the post office account in the name of ○○○ located in Suwon-si on February 16, 2009, and received and taken over the passbook and cash card which is the means of access.

B. On February 16, 2009, the Defendant had a post office of △△△ established the post office passbook account (******************) in the name of △△△ on February 16, 2009, and received the passbook and cash card which is the means of access *******).

C. Although the Defendant is not allowed to acquire the means of access, such as a passbook, the Defendant had him/her establish the passbook account (********************)*******) in the name of the Notarial family of this case, and received and taken over the passbook and cash card, which is the means of access.

라. 피고인은 누구든지 통장 등 접근매체를 양수하여서는 아니됨에도 불구하고 2009. 3. 중순경 수원시 소재 상호불상의 식당에서 ▷▷▷로부터 ◁◁◁ 명의의 00통장 ( * * * * * * - * * - * * * * * * ) 과 현금카드를 교부받아 이를 양수하였다 .

마. 피고인은 누구든지 통장 등 접근매체를 양수하여서는 아니됨에도 불구하고 2009. 2. 중순경 수원시 ○○사거리에서 ▶▶▶으로부터 ▶▶▶ 명의의 OO은행 통장 ( * * * * * * - * * - * * * * * * ) 과 현금카드를 교부받아 이를 양수하였다 .

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of the Judgment】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Each police statement on ○○○○, ○○○, and ○○○;

1. Each e-mail statement of a victim'sO,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O, orO;

1. Sector of a report on damage by newspapers and sites;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. 수사보고 ( ♧♧ 관련 피해사례 첨부 )

1. 각 ☆☆☆☆ 무선망 결제대행 계약서 ( ○○네트워크, ●● 네트워크, □□□네트워크 , ▲▲▲, 0 ) 사본

1. A copy of each letter of certification and BB use contract (referred to as △Nek Work, 7 No. Donesk Work);

1. 각 결제내역 ( ○○네트워크, ●● 네트워크, □□□네트워크, △△네트워크, ⑦⑦ 네트워크, ▲▲▲, 0 ) 사본

1. Habituality of the judgment: The defendant has committed fraud with the intent to obtain money equivalent to information use fees from many victims by means of mobile phone text messages, and with the intention to obtain money from 30,000 people through 7 trade names, and with the same method from the victims via 30,000 people through 30,000 people, and it can be recognized as a habit of fraud in light of the fact that the number and methods of crimes are remarkably repeated, and the criminal intention has continuously been revealed.

[Article 2]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. An interrogation protocol of a police officer againstO,O,O,O, orO;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 3(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes, Articles 351 and 347(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, each of the former Electronic Financial Transactions Act (amended by Act No. 9325 of Dec. 31, 2008), Articles 49(5)1 and 6(3) (the acquisition of means of access and the choice of imprisonment)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) from among concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed in the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment,

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 55(1)3

The defendant and his defense counsel held that the content provision business, such as the crime No. 1 of the defendant's judgment, is difficult to view that the phrase of the text message sent by the defendant is a text message sent by the will of unspecified victims in light of the content of the provision of text message, and it is difficult to view that the victim's use fee is not imposed, but the victim's use fee is charged, and the victim's use fee is charged, and the user fee is imposed only after receiving the user's terms and conditions, information service fee is imposed, and the user's telephone number is charged. Thus, the victim's use fee is imposed, even if the above text message is advertised and the information service fee is imposed. The victim's use fee is even a person who has been aware of the fact that the above text message is advertising and the information service fee is imposed. In light of the fact that the defendant sent the victim with the pictures and processed the victim's demand for refund, the defendant cannot be punished as a habitual fraud.

In light of the above evidence, the victims who made a statement to an investigative agency on the fact of damage stated that ① the victims, such as the victim who made a statement to the investigation agency, mispercing that they sent the text message to the defendant, and, if they knew that it was paid service, they did not take the cell phone pressings to pay information service charges. ② The defendant's part deliberated by the relevant agencies is about the business method of radio Internet content service, not the content of specific contents service, ③ because the victims' photographs are in China's Internet site because they cannot be deemed to have value of KRW 2,90,00, it is difficult for the victims to receive the content service until they paid their money. ④ The defendant sent the text message to women who did not need to look at the above women's photographs, and the text message itself did not guide the victims that information service charges should be imposed, and ④ even according to the victim's argument, the defendant's character of information service charges should not be acknowledged regardless of the victim's intent to use the pictures obtained from the text message.

In light of the above circumstances, it is recognized that the amount of information usage fee was acquired by unspecified victims as stated in paragraph (1) of the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and the criminal intent was expressed at the time of the above crime, and the same applies even if the defendant received a request for refund after the crime, so the above argument by the defendant and the defense counsel is not acceptable.

Grounds for sentencing

The defendant's crime of this case shall be sentenced to punishment to the defendant in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed by deceiving money from many unspecified victims using mobile phone text messages, and the crime of fraud is a bad and a large amount of money, and the safety and reliability of financial transactions is harmed by taking over the passbook and cash card in the name of another person.

However, there is no criminal records that the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment before the crime of this case; the net profit that the defendant actually acquired by the crime of this case seems to be less than the amount of the fraud in the judgment; the victims who have demanded a refund of the amount of damage have refunded all the amount of the amount of fraud; and other various circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and circumstance leading to each crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments shall be determined as ordered.

Judges of the presiding judge 000

Judges OO-

Judges 0