The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From around 2008, the Defendant, from around 2008, operated a business providing radio Internet content in a way that provides the users with the wireless network provided by telecommunications business operators, such as SK Telecom, K, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, etc., by providing the wireless Internet content to the users of the mobile phones and settling the fee including the fee for the use of the mobile phones.

As such, the Defendant provided the wireless Internet contents to the non-permanent cell phone users and allowed them to access the contents, the fact is merely that the contents of the contents are collected by domestic women, and the cost of viewing the above pictures by the Defendant’s access to the above website reaches 2,90 won, despite the fact that the cell phone users knew that the mobile phone users would not have access to the contents, they were sent text messages that may mislead the users of the non-permanent cell phone users as if they sent the photo, and allowed them to open the pay pictures provided by the Defendant on the above website by accessing the cell phone users through the wireless network and look at the users of the non-permanent cell phone by opening the above pictures. The fact was expressed to obtain economic benefits equivalent to the above amount by automatically paying the above content charges of 2,90 won.

On January 30, 2010, the Defendant sent text messages to the victim R's mobile phone numbers secured by the Defendant at the Defendant's office located in Goyang-gu Q20, Yongsan-gu Q20, Goyang-gu, Seoul, by using the Internet mobile phone text messages in large numbers of cell phones messages, and by pretending that the victim's will send pictures to the victim, “There is a multi-tamp (2) unit stored in storage.”