logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 04. 30. 선고 2013누20242 판결
연구및인력개발비는 수탁업체의 재위탁 여부 및 재수탁업체의 연구전담부서 보유 여부에 관계없이 세액공제대상임 [국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap34440 ( October 14, 2013)

Title

Research and human resources development expenses are subject to tax credit regardless of whether the trustee is re-entrusted, and whether the trustee is holding a research department of the re-entrusted company

Summary

Research and human resources development expenses paid by entrusting research services to an enterprise with a department in exclusive charge of research shall be eligible for tax credit regardless of whether it is re-entrusted by an entrusted enterprise and whether it is owned by a department in exclusive charge of

Cases

2013Nu20242 Revocation of revocation of a request for corporate tax revision

Plaintiff, Appellant

AA card corporation

Defendant, appellant and appellant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap34440 decided June 14, 2013

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 19, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

April 30, 2014

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on September 28, 2012 against the plaintiff is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. cite the judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow